As the world embraces the advent of high powered intelligent works of the new age, more and more areas of labor have become less strenuous especially that people in the contemporary times are quite open-minded about these changes. Today, more than ever, jobs of most professionals are rather enjoyable not because of numerous benefits employees obtain, but the amount of time they save while doing their tasks of the day. What is more, many people nowadays are given enough time to do their hobbies and special pursuits.
However, in conjunction with these changes are critical concerns for which traditional practices are needed to be altered. Whether or not these are related to business or other lines of work, professionals need to do more than necessary for if not, be bound to suffer from worse consequences in future business dealings. As for the legal practice, many have wondered about the relevance of electronic discovery statistics that has now reached to the far ends of the world.
Electronic discovery market is never just any trend. This is a core of the protection law in the legal practice that encompasses acumen and expertise of different legal professionals including those concentrating on records management, forensics and information technology. Although it is essentially practiced in the United States and in many European countries, several other territories show relative interest about the implementation of such practice.
Litigation or regulatory proceedings necessitate proper predictive-coding system and technology-based document reviews. With the density of any legal tasks, the legal office simply needs to seek out high-speed processing software efficient enough in categorizing data and in executing apposite indexing.
Sophisticated technologies such as this provide not just maximum ease while quantifying data from current and previous samples. This delivers accurate results yet users are advised about familiarizing the right execution method before trying their hands at it. It is only with effective use that the system can work out perfectly.
Attorneys are also encouraged to do their fair share in reviewing data manually to ensure consistency and reliability. The review process may take long but it is important to double check results. This software is designed to give the most reliable statistical results but that does not mean lawyers are excused from their primary duty.
Results obtained from manual review, however, are rather tested for consistency than sophisticated sampling produced by such software. Technology-assisted review is believed to yield precise results with lesser effort. Nonetheless, manual reviews are considered more effective albeit being strenuous and confounding.
Meanwhile, in regard to reliability, technology-assisted process remains an important subject for discussion though its cost-effectiveness has been remarkable. Human review process must be carried out not only once. Results need to be compared several times so as to ensure consistencies.
Furthermore, since knowledge about sampling is important in attaining right results, it might be wise for a legal practitioner to consult an expert at such technology or any other scientific phenomena. An expert can clearly show him the correct sampling process and verify sample sizes exactly. Also, he can establish utter confidence level on statistical inferences as well as identify the standard formula for the process.
However, in conjunction with these changes are critical concerns for which traditional practices are needed to be altered. Whether or not these are related to business or other lines of work, professionals need to do more than necessary for if not, be bound to suffer from worse consequences in future business dealings. As for the legal practice, many have wondered about the relevance of electronic discovery statistics that has now reached to the far ends of the world.
Electronic discovery market is never just any trend. This is a core of the protection law in the legal practice that encompasses acumen and expertise of different legal professionals including those concentrating on records management, forensics and information technology. Although it is essentially practiced in the United States and in many European countries, several other territories show relative interest about the implementation of such practice.
Litigation or regulatory proceedings necessitate proper predictive-coding system and technology-based document reviews. With the density of any legal tasks, the legal office simply needs to seek out high-speed processing software efficient enough in categorizing data and in executing apposite indexing.
Sophisticated technologies such as this provide not just maximum ease while quantifying data from current and previous samples. This delivers accurate results yet users are advised about familiarizing the right execution method before trying their hands at it. It is only with effective use that the system can work out perfectly.
Attorneys are also encouraged to do their fair share in reviewing data manually to ensure consistency and reliability. The review process may take long but it is important to double check results. This software is designed to give the most reliable statistical results but that does not mean lawyers are excused from their primary duty.
Results obtained from manual review, however, are rather tested for consistency than sophisticated sampling produced by such software. Technology-assisted review is believed to yield precise results with lesser effort. Nonetheless, manual reviews are considered more effective albeit being strenuous and confounding.
Meanwhile, in regard to reliability, technology-assisted process remains an important subject for discussion though its cost-effectiveness has been remarkable. Human review process must be carried out not only once. Results need to be compared several times so as to ensure consistencies.
Furthermore, since knowledge about sampling is important in attaining right results, it might be wise for a legal practitioner to consult an expert at such technology or any other scientific phenomena. An expert can clearly show him the correct sampling process and verify sample sizes exactly. Also, he can establish utter confidence level on statistical inferences as well as identify the standard formula for the process.
About the Author:
The following website features up-to-date electronic discovery statistics for all your needs. For further info, you are welcome to check out our web pages now at http://www.statisticsforlawyers.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment