Firstly , it really is without any doubt that the continuously superb standing of NUS inside the worldwide university education landscape is a robust testimonial of the weight of the institution.
The fast progress of the university can even be noticed from casual observation without the in-depth evaluation by THE. With regards to research, the NUS medical school has forged partnership together with the Duke Medical School, 1 of the top in the United states. The combined program motivates cooperation in research as well as college student exchange.
In terms of student development, the University Scholars Program and also the U-town residential program have included significantly variety into students' academic life, ushering in western education technique inside a liberal arts environment.
Thus, it's not at all shocking to find out the standing of NUS escalate really fast, in addition to its reputation within Singapore and also the planet, a reputation that may be vital to draw the top students and professors, whose inflow results in a virtuous cycle of the institution's improvement.
Nevertheless, you will discover prospective disadvantages around the preoccupation with ranking by university along with the general community as a whole. The current methodology in reviewing university is far from ideal and regularly susceptible to critique. Weight assigned to distinct areas, irrespective of how carefully considered, is essentially arbitrary.
One particular significant area of question lies with the balance involving research and teaching. A professor is required to dedicate time in teaching undergrads and doing research for the purpose of publications. The former is considered as being the principal goal of building a college although the latter is generally considered as a better criterion while looking for the ranking of a college.
If a lot of emphasis is on how many quality papers a university has published inside the first-tier global journals, for instance, this type of evaluation bias might be translated into demand for professors to publish.
A number of universities, like Hong Kong University, have even set up a minimal quota on the quantity of papers to be published every thing. Even in the absence of an explicit quota, as in the instance of NUS, implicit pressure of linking publication to tenure review is adequate to nail the idea of 'publish or perish' in the heads of academicians.
Expense of placing a lot more time in research is normally much less time or interest devoted to undergraduate educating. This can be often observed in insufficient fervour from lecturers and also incredibly low availability of tutors who look always preoccupied.
At the end of the day, what really does society stand to benefit if increased university rating mainly reflects higher quality research that is certainly basically immaterial to students?
In addition, some critical elements of higher education could be underrepresented in appraisal of colleges. Inspite of the high position of NUS, one particular matter stays unresolved by the college: academic freedom or autonomy. University as a notion symbolizes liberty of thinking and expression that are vehicle of intellectual advancement of society.
On the other hand, NUS and quite a few other Asian educational institutions embarrassingly usually do not get outstanding credit for that facet. Actually, NUS president, Professor Tan Chorh Chuan stated following the release of ranking that NUS continued progress is a outcome of constant help from the Singapore government. That is already a proof of the close tie between NUS along with the government. In actual fact, much of the college funds originates from the government.
The undermine in academic independence is best noticed within the political science division of NUS which has come under scrutiny for its very clear lack of critical voices. The division has been labeled as "docile", unwilling to maintain itself as an impartial voice within the political discussion.
On the other hand, majority of the established schools in foreign countries are private and they enjoy substantially increased liberty of intellectual inquiry that ultimately benefits the whole society.
The truth is, the founding of Yale-NUS Liberal Arts College a handful of years ago caused much dissatisfaction around the move from the Yale community that considers the Singapore political environment as not favorable forliberal arts learning.
It's suffice to say that in addition to improving university ranking, the institution also requires to meet its social expectation by locating a fine line between having government backing and remaining politically impartial.
Without doubt just before it makes THE delighted , it ought to please Singapore students, public observers and educators first, who're the real stakeholders of the education within the country.
The fast progress of the university can even be noticed from casual observation without the in-depth evaluation by THE. With regards to research, the NUS medical school has forged partnership together with the Duke Medical School, 1 of the top in the United states. The combined program motivates cooperation in research as well as college student exchange.
In terms of student development, the University Scholars Program and also the U-town residential program have included significantly variety into students' academic life, ushering in western education technique inside a liberal arts environment.
Thus, it's not at all shocking to find out the standing of NUS escalate really fast, in addition to its reputation within Singapore and also the planet, a reputation that may be vital to draw the top students and professors, whose inflow results in a virtuous cycle of the institution's improvement.
Nevertheless, you will discover prospective disadvantages around the preoccupation with ranking by university along with the general community as a whole. The current methodology in reviewing university is far from ideal and regularly susceptible to critique. Weight assigned to distinct areas, irrespective of how carefully considered, is essentially arbitrary.
One particular significant area of question lies with the balance involving research and teaching. A professor is required to dedicate time in teaching undergrads and doing research for the purpose of publications. The former is considered as being the principal goal of building a college although the latter is generally considered as a better criterion while looking for the ranking of a college.
If a lot of emphasis is on how many quality papers a university has published inside the first-tier global journals, for instance, this type of evaluation bias might be translated into demand for professors to publish.
A number of universities, like Hong Kong University, have even set up a minimal quota on the quantity of papers to be published every thing. Even in the absence of an explicit quota, as in the instance of NUS, implicit pressure of linking publication to tenure review is adequate to nail the idea of 'publish or perish' in the heads of academicians.
Expense of placing a lot more time in research is normally much less time or interest devoted to undergraduate educating. This can be often observed in insufficient fervour from lecturers and also incredibly low availability of tutors who look always preoccupied.
At the end of the day, what really does society stand to benefit if increased university rating mainly reflects higher quality research that is certainly basically immaterial to students?
In addition, some critical elements of higher education could be underrepresented in appraisal of colleges. Inspite of the high position of NUS, one particular matter stays unresolved by the college: academic freedom or autonomy. University as a notion symbolizes liberty of thinking and expression that are vehicle of intellectual advancement of society.
On the other hand, NUS and quite a few other Asian educational institutions embarrassingly usually do not get outstanding credit for that facet. Actually, NUS president, Professor Tan Chorh Chuan stated following the release of ranking that NUS continued progress is a outcome of constant help from the Singapore government. That is already a proof of the close tie between NUS along with the government. In actual fact, much of the college funds originates from the government.
The undermine in academic independence is best noticed within the political science division of NUS which has come under scrutiny for its very clear lack of critical voices. The division has been labeled as "docile", unwilling to maintain itself as an impartial voice within the political discussion.
On the other hand, majority of the established schools in foreign countries are private and they enjoy substantially increased liberty of intellectual inquiry that ultimately benefits the whole society.
The truth is, the founding of Yale-NUS Liberal Arts College a handful of years ago caused much dissatisfaction around the move from the Yale community that considers the Singapore political environment as not favorable forliberal arts learning.
It's suffice to say that in addition to improving university ranking, the institution also requires to meet its social expectation by locating a fine line between having government backing and remaining politically impartial.
Without doubt just before it makes THE delighted , it ought to please Singapore students, public observers and educators first, who're the real stakeholders of the education within the country.
About the Author:
The author is a graduate of the university in Singapore and has been writing about studying in singapore in the last 5 years. Since his graduation, he has been providing tuition to students , enabling them to realize their goal of being a graduate in a prestigious university.
No comments:
Post a Comment