Exam result oriented teaching is basically a concept whereby the trainer understands the examination contents really well and takes the students through the coursework, all the whilst holding his/her attention around the idea that the only real target is to make it possible for the individual to obtain superb marks on the examination itself , irregardless of the curriculum contents.
Although there may be no arguing that this educating approach attains the goal of making certain the great bulk of pupils will score well in the exams, one must question yet again - is this the proper technique to educate our kids?
In most cases, the system that incorporates an exam outcome oriented strategy of teaching is developing a fictitious condition of "easy testing." This might cause a pupil who transfers out of this school and into one where by a far more traditional philosophy is taught and practiced to flunk terribly since there's no longer a very concise and clear knowing of precisely what to be expecting when it comes time for exams.
Likewise, when a student graduates right from high school and gets into university, if they happen to attend a university, or possibly a course, where by exam result oriented teaching is not really the normal practice, they're going to find it invariably a lot more challenging to be successful in that testing environment. Nonetheless, apart from immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, pupils can engage in ways to perform well in exams.
Exam outcome oriented teaching creates a false perception of security as well as confidence in one's life itself. A student that has been put through an examination grades oriented training will not know how to come back if they end up with a misstep on an examination; nor do these people understand how to study diligently for the "unknown" of not really able to assert with certainty that they without a doubt know all the solutions to all of the queries in life - er - to all of the questions that could be on the exam.
When the pros are heavily weighted in the benefits for the school; for retention of essential funding and to the all round ease of the cookie-cutter curriculum that gets stale and repeatable, the cons are significantly far more ominous for our little ones who are not learning the invaluable ability of the way to find out on their own, or how to study intensely for anything they want or ought to attain.
When these young ones enter the labor force and the real world they may learn that the utopia they're used to, this total perception of entitlement, carries with it a harsh epiphany that world isn't fair. That life is just not simple. And regrettably, they are ill-prepared.
This could possibly lead to depression, confusion, in addition to despair. This could cause an otherwise ordinary pupil to function sub-par in their jobs, and hence make a lifelong path of underachieving; only because they were never made clear to during their formative time how to work hard to obtain what they really want, instead of having everything basically handed down to them.
However, it is also entirely possible that the self-confidence that was instilled by a relatively "effortless" education approach helps to give a young adult the confidence to be successful in more demanding predicaments. When presented with an unknown variable, they're going to come to feel confident they can handle it with grace and peace of mind, simply because - after all - they have constantly been in a position to do so.
For that reason, as soon as they enter into the workforce and society as an grownup, they're a go-getter, because they know they're now able to succeed. It's been a proven truth of their whole life up to their adult years that they carry with them during every single challenge they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out over the actual impact to society of examination result oriented teaching, but it is clear that we're teaching our small children a lesson - whether or not it is a favourable lesson or a detrimental lesson may not still be clear.
Although there may be no arguing that this educating approach attains the goal of making certain the great bulk of pupils will score well in the exams, one must question yet again - is this the proper technique to educate our kids?
In most cases, the system that incorporates an exam outcome oriented strategy of teaching is developing a fictitious condition of "easy testing." This might cause a pupil who transfers out of this school and into one where by a far more traditional philosophy is taught and practiced to flunk terribly since there's no longer a very concise and clear knowing of precisely what to be expecting when it comes time for exams.
Likewise, when a student graduates right from high school and gets into university, if they happen to attend a university, or possibly a course, where by exam result oriented teaching is not really the normal practice, they're going to find it invariably a lot more challenging to be successful in that testing environment. Nonetheless, apart from immersing in an exams-oriented teaching environment, pupils can engage in ways to perform well in exams.
Exam outcome oriented teaching creates a false perception of security as well as confidence in one's life itself. A student that has been put through an examination grades oriented training will not know how to come back if they end up with a misstep on an examination; nor do these people understand how to study diligently for the "unknown" of not really able to assert with certainty that they without a doubt know all the solutions to all of the queries in life - er - to all of the questions that could be on the exam.
When the pros are heavily weighted in the benefits for the school; for retention of essential funding and to the all round ease of the cookie-cutter curriculum that gets stale and repeatable, the cons are significantly far more ominous for our little ones who are not learning the invaluable ability of the way to find out on their own, or how to study intensely for anything they want or ought to attain.
When these young ones enter the labor force and the real world they may learn that the utopia they're used to, this total perception of entitlement, carries with it a harsh epiphany that world isn't fair. That life is just not simple. And regrettably, they are ill-prepared.
This could possibly lead to depression, confusion, in addition to despair. This could cause an otherwise ordinary pupil to function sub-par in their jobs, and hence make a lifelong path of underachieving; only because they were never made clear to during their formative time how to work hard to obtain what they really want, instead of having everything basically handed down to them.
However, it is also entirely possible that the self-confidence that was instilled by a relatively "effortless" education approach helps to give a young adult the confidence to be successful in more demanding predicaments. When presented with an unknown variable, they're going to come to feel confident they can handle it with grace and peace of mind, simply because - after all - they have constantly been in a position to do so.
For that reason, as soon as they enter into the workforce and society as an grownup, they're a go-getter, because they know they're now able to succeed. It's been a proven truth of their whole life up to their adult years that they carry with them during every single challenge they encounter in life.
The jury may very well be out over the actual impact to society of examination result oriented teaching, but it is clear that we're teaching our small children a lesson - whether or not it is a favourable lesson or a detrimental lesson may not still be clear.
About the Author:
The author has been a tutor for the last 5 years in Singapore, an exams grades oriented country. she writes often in her blog on taking exams such as O levels and other exams in Singapore.
No comments:
Post a Comment