It is hard to escape the onslaught of information on the prevention and treatment of heart disease and cancer, the two most common causes of serious illness and death. It may surprise some to learn that the third leading cause is medical error, an over-arching category that includes mistakes made in treatment due to omission or improper administration. A medical malpractice lawyer represents patients seeking compensation and closure.
Medicine is not an exact science, and all doctors make mistakes. Discovering an error does not automatically create grounds for a lawsuit. Each case has its own unique circumstances, and in order to justify legal action it must be possible to show that a doctor not only made a serious mistake, but that it caused provable harm to the patient. Without an attorney, that may be difficult.
The benchmark for these cases is referred to as the standard of care, including practices and procedures commonly used to help patients experiencing similar issues. These usually include the type of problem being treated, the age of the person involved, and often the geographical location where it occurred. While the situation may initially seem straightforward, it must be possible to prove that a breach in protocol occurred.
Even if the circumstances seem beyond question, a malpractice suit may be lengthy and complicated. Nearly all procedures have a recognized failure rate, and a negative outcome does not always constitute proof of incompetency, but is often a combination of complications and other related factors. It is incumbent on the patient to demonstrate that a doctor or institution was actually negligent.
When there is a bad result, the families and patients involved must not only deal with the physical circumstances, but also face the challenge of negotiating a tangled legal thicket. Those involved may be unaware that significant time limits are imposed on those considering malpractice legal action, and that most must first be reviewed by a panel of experts including both doctors and lawyers.
Before filing a claim, all significant records with bearing on the case must be presented for expert review, and there is a limited time period during which both sides can examine the evidence and circumstances. While some cases may be settled by arbitration or mediation, they are few in number. The vast majority of reviews rule in favor of physicians, making a lawsuit necessary.
In the majority of cases that go to trial, both sides must bolster their arguments using the testimony of expert witnesses, who are allegedly most knowledgeable about their field of testimony. The opinions from both sides are often divergent, and the ultimate decision is left for the jury, who make decisions regarding culpability and the amount of compensation to be awarded for suffering and financial loss.
These and other issues make this field of law too involved to negotiate unless an attorney is involved. People living in Hammond, LA who face similar circumstances obtain the best results when they choose a firm or individual with proven experience and a record of winning cases. Although it is not always possible to prevail in every situation, a competent lawyer can greatly increase the chances.
Medicine is not an exact science, and all doctors make mistakes. Discovering an error does not automatically create grounds for a lawsuit. Each case has its own unique circumstances, and in order to justify legal action it must be possible to show that a doctor not only made a serious mistake, but that it caused provable harm to the patient. Without an attorney, that may be difficult.
The benchmark for these cases is referred to as the standard of care, including practices and procedures commonly used to help patients experiencing similar issues. These usually include the type of problem being treated, the age of the person involved, and often the geographical location where it occurred. While the situation may initially seem straightforward, it must be possible to prove that a breach in protocol occurred.
Even if the circumstances seem beyond question, a malpractice suit may be lengthy and complicated. Nearly all procedures have a recognized failure rate, and a negative outcome does not always constitute proof of incompetency, but is often a combination of complications and other related factors. It is incumbent on the patient to demonstrate that a doctor or institution was actually negligent.
When there is a bad result, the families and patients involved must not only deal with the physical circumstances, but also face the challenge of negotiating a tangled legal thicket. Those involved may be unaware that significant time limits are imposed on those considering malpractice legal action, and that most must first be reviewed by a panel of experts including both doctors and lawyers.
Before filing a claim, all significant records with bearing on the case must be presented for expert review, and there is a limited time period during which both sides can examine the evidence and circumstances. While some cases may be settled by arbitration or mediation, they are few in number. The vast majority of reviews rule in favor of physicians, making a lawsuit necessary.
In the majority of cases that go to trial, both sides must bolster their arguments using the testimony of expert witnesses, who are allegedly most knowledgeable about their field of testimony. The opinions from both sides are often divergent, and the ultimate decision is left for the jury, who make decisions regarding culpability and the amount of compensation to be awarded for suffering and financial loss.
These and other issues make this field of law too involved to negotiate unless an attorney is involved. People living in Hammond, LA who face similar circumstances obtain the best results when they choose a firm or individual with proven experience and a record of winning cases. Although it is not always possible to prevail in every situation, a competent lawyer can greatly increase the chances.
About the Author:
You can visit www.abjustice.com for more helpful information about How To Determine Whether Hiring A Medical Malpractice Lawyer Makes Sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment