Thursday, 25 June 2015

Joe Piacentile: Common Terms In The Courtroom

By Bob Oliver


If you're going to become involved in the courtroom, it's likely in your best interest to know as many terms as possible. Even though many of the terms in question will stand out to you, others may be a little less obvious. This is where the expertise of Joe Piacentile and other authorities can come into play, as they can provide the utmost information for your benefit. If you want to talk about common courtroom terminology, here are just a few definitions to note.

Damages - When you think about damages, as it relates to legal proceedings, what comes to mind? For the sake of argument, let's say that someone's reputation has been smeared online, either through false publications, slanderous video content, or what have you. Not only can this create stress, but it's very difficult for those kinds of elements to be cleared away. The money by the court, to the person being targeted, would be considered the damages by names like Joseph Piacentile.

Cross-Examination - One of the goals of any hearing is the obtaining of information. This is where the process of cross-examination will come into effect, which is a process that more than matters. Keep in mind that the person being spoken to must give the most honest answers possible, not to mention with the utmost accuracy. Seeing as how an oath is pledged beforehand, this shouldn't be much of a concern in a traditional environment such as this.

Breach - What happens when you break some kind of rule, as it relates to legal proceedings? This is where a breach will be seen, which can be applied to other endeavors as well. Maybe you have signed a contract with your place of work, keeping you on for another few years with guaranteed pay. Failure to live up to that contact, on your end, means that you are in breach of said contact. In short, this is a negative circumstance that names like Joe Piacentile can draw your attention to.

Verdict - Even if you aren't familiar with law, as a whole, you probably already know what this terms means. A verdict, for the uninitiated, is the final decision made by the judge. In short, it illustrates the guilt or innocence of the accused in any given case, before the aforementioned damages are discussed. All of the work that is done in this case - from the jury to the defense attorney - all leads up the final verdict given by the judge, which is arguably the most vital component that can be seen.




About the Author:



No comments:

Post a Comment